|
|
Post by Admin on Sept 3, 2017 23:20:57 GMT
Brand new 'forum blog', just testing right now, setting things up, which will take weeks, months even, but the writing will come, regardless...
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Sept 3, 2017 23:38:49 GMT
Not sharing posts yet, but for future reading, want readers to know 'moderator' category was first to go, in that on other forums moderators act like 'thought sharks', so quick to delete, rather than try to listen and understand.
As long as thought is polite, and seeks to clarify self, all thought or views, angles, should be listened to and considered.
This is a ghost forum, so stay tuned, have much construction to do...
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Sept 4, 2017 13:53:23 GMT
This is a ghost forumThis is a ghost forum, in that participation is not really needed, in that most people are not 'ghosts', and as such have the ability to kill conversations really quick, in that they feel just cause they conclude an idea or thought, that that thought or idea should die...wrong. Thoughts and ideas go on for 1000's of years, and don't just die simply cause one or two or 5 or 100 people pass verdict on it, as long as alive and breathing, you will generate thoughts and ideas, and those thoughts and ideas will evolve and change over time. No one is ever really right or wrong, all I care is that thought expressed is 'polite' and done in 'lesson book' type of manner. As a 'ghost', I think for many, say, express, what many common class cannot, and is why I get views. But as a 'ghost', I speak for all, regardless of color or gender or culture, eventually will find own thoughts on here as posts accumulate. One cannot be 'god' or claim to know 'god', if one only represents one particular brand of human. If 'God' indeed created all birds, than God should know how all birds function, what they eat, and how each bird fly's. Man is hyper dense to me. Human nature always contradicts and overrides mans own belief system. We're 'pack animals', but when don't belong to any particular pack, one tends to observe things the way a scientist does, from afar, by studying habits and patterns. Sometimes stupid people are the safest, it's the wise, who 'ate of the apple', that are often tormented by knowing more than small brains capable of handling... And with that, lets begin this wild fun, intuitive ride of thought and learning. 
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Sept 5, 2017 1:01:20 GMT
Tomorrow approaches like an ugly storm Tomorrow approaches like an ugly storm cloud, full of wrath and fury, at least for me and many others. In my opinion, there's nothing good about tomorrow, string enough tomorrows together and all you get is mishaps, sickness, sorrow and death. Tomorrow catches up with everyone eventually, but is always biting on the heals of the needy, for sure, all the time. But tomorrow comes after and corrodes the life, aspirations, dreams and hopes of the rich and wealth also, sooner or later. Tomorrow is no bodies friend, all tomorrow is is one step closer to nothing. On here you only get the truth, not fairytales...
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Sept 10, 2017 3:06:02 GMT
Why the working poor rarely go to Doctor
Why the working poor, rarely go to doctor.
The working poor or those who are alone, and feel unloved.
Why?
Cause the working poor, the homeless, can't afford treatment.
Single women on Gov assistance with kids can and do, of course, but I'm not talking about 'that class', I'm talking about the working poor, single people who work, but wages keep them poor, and or even some of the homeless or 'street' class of people.
Take 'myself' for example, if went to doctor, found out I had this or that, what the heck could I do about it?
Living check to check, I can't afford treatment, time away from job, would lose all while trying to seek treatment, so what's the point?
So why bother knowing about something one cannot fix, is how the poor and down trodden see it.
I know this sounds weird to wealthy types, or those in loving families, but to those existing on the 'Outer Limits' of society, it's perfectly normal to just pass away, die, and be forgotten when time comes, no funeral, nothing.
Those who seek treatment for illnesses are those who feel love, have families, cause family tells them to, those who are not loved and alone, simply live as long as can, until illness prevents them from working, and then simply ______ ______ and it's over.
Sad, I know, but it's reality for many.
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Sept 12, 2017 23:22:18 GMT
Women have stolen, 'feminized' so many styles, clothing, hats, patters, that use to be maleThe other day, while shopping, walked through male section of Walmart and then female section, and noticed that a lot of the more colorful styles in the female section, particularly hats, use to be what males wore in the 60's and back, or even 70's. Captain type hats...for example, use to be exclusively male style, but all it take is one female at some fashion show to wear it, and suddenly it's 'feminized'.... Cowboy boots...once upon a time exclusively male, but let female model put on, and now feminized... Pants, hats, purses and more, all these use to be male, but females just keep intruding in on male style and fashion, and once seen on female, it's feminized forever. This leaves males with fewer and fewer style option, dull ball caps, dull shirts, and dull shoes... Well while at Walmart, the other day, I bought a hat, that use to be 'manly'...kind of a 'captain' styled hat or 'skipper' type hat, which for some reason has been 'feminized'...but I bought it anyways...  (Click to enlarge) But the hat I bought has buckles on the side. All I'm saying is if you look at old movies from the 60's back, all these styles were what men wore, Shrimp boat captains, ect... And now suddenly 'feminized' cause some runway model wears it. There was a time when it was OK for men, males, to have broader fashion range, and still be considered 'hetro', but now days that seems to be ever shrinking, which is not fair to me. The late 60's was kind of last time males allowed to be as colorful, in fashion, as female counterparts, without having their sexual identity come into question. In the mean time, females continue to intrude in on the male realm of dress and fashion, while never giving up their own. Not here.
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Oct 2, 2017 0:26:05 GMT
Why do clothing designers, when it comes to men, or males, always think that 'X-Large = Fat??Why do clothing designers, of male clothing, always assume that if tall, must be FAT!! Ever heard of tall and proportioned??, duh, obviously not. Sorry, but just cause one is tall, doesn't mean one is fat!!, like a football player. Shopping for tall, yet slender, clothing is hard, when a male, cause stupid, low designer IQ, male clothing makers always assume that the taller one is the fatter they are, like a football player or something. I'm tall, OK, but not 'fat'! Why can't clothing designers realize that, for myself and others. Just because tall, doesn't mean I have a size 40 waist or 50 waist, I can be tall and have a 30-33 size waist, OK. I mean whether buying rain gear, overalls, or any other type of male clothing, things only come in large, x large or 2 extra large...but never come in like tall and slim. One can be tall, without being fat, OK.... Heck, maybe I'll create own clothing brand for tall, slender, fit males, sense current generic industry to stupid to do so...and there by force tall slender males to have to wear over sized clownish extra baggy crap, cause designer to stupid to realize not all tall people are fat!! 
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Oct 9, 2017 0:50:17 GMT
Why? (click to enlarge) Cute, what is that? Cute is a relative term, yes no? Cute attracts, nature utilizes 'cute' to attract opposite sex for the purpose of mating, carrying on species, as in butterfly's, birds and more, the more 'cute' gender is within species, the better chance of attracting mate. All that said, what is the phycology behind a male wanting to be 'cute'? Females are 'cute', or try to be, to attract male mate which = urge to reproduce and pass on DNA, (whether they realize it or not) But when a human male desires to be 'cute', what exactly is their goal, end game?, in that human males, regardless of how 'cute', cannot get pregnant, so what exactly do human males, who want to be cute, aim for? Attention?, Love and or to be desired by another??? Why do males desire to be cute?, and whom do they attempt to attract by being cute? Does wanting to be 'cute', pretty, mean one is gay? or just lonely? I can't answer these questions in that everyone has own reason for being, and doing. One thing is for sure, not everyone, in todays world of surplus, will or can be paired, as such there's many single people out there, but just because single doesn't mean one doesn't want to be hugged, loved and cared for. I mean even stray cats and dogs and even birds desire basic companionship, so why would it be any different for supposed evolved 'man'. Maybe religion was designed to keep people, humans, in line, but as religion dissipates in modern era, what definitions will replace it? And if it's OK for a male peacock to look beautiful, why is it wrong, in some peoples mind, for a male human to do the same?
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Oct 9, 2017 1:44:13 GMT
Are males who want to look 'cute' evil? Are males who want to be or happen to be 'cute' evil? The older I get, the less I care about what people want to be or do, on personal time, as long as don't make my life harder. And to me, a male wanting to be 'cute' is not 'evil', but rather a joy, in that in course of day would rather run into 'cute' males than ugly dirty bearded ones who make ____shrink. In the end, not sure what really matters, other than how you, or one, treated others while alive...  (click to enlarge) link
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Oct 10, 2017 1:13:17 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Oct 21, 2017 22:30:34 GMT
If deemed 'black' ugly and a thug, praised by demons, but if don't fit that mold, ignored, so telling If you're a 'black' male or deemed as such, your role is to be 'ugly' stupid, dense and tough, or a 'Orc' from 'Lord of the rings', in order to fulfill other peoples contrasting view of selves. But if you're deemed 'black', or male of color, and 'free'...you suddenly become a threat to those who need you to be 'rough and animalistic' in order for their definitions about self to be comfortable. It's gross and sick when you think about it, how 'human' most humans are, how insect like most humans are. How fleshly hardwired most humans are, how so easily conditioned most humans are. This 'spot' is meant for so very few.
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Nov 12, 2017 20:36:58 GMT
Tomorrow, grossTomorrow, gross, who needs it. 1. Fools speeding, racing to work, like fools, many will cause wrecks and lose lives, while simply rushing to get to job they already hate, makes zero since to me. 2. Have to show up to job where Managers, Supervisors, less mentally or physically fit than self, see you, reduce you, to only being 'mindless labor', and have no idea how 'vast' you, me, others, are on the inside, and purposely refuse to see our other sides in order to maintain a slavish control over us. 3. One day, hours, closer to demise. And could go on and on, bottom line, tomorrow sucks, where real creative self will have to 'die' in order to make others feel comfortable. God is not in man, that's all I can say...Christian or not, God is not in man. 
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Nov 12, 2017 23:34:15 GMT
If you think you're your 'flesh' than already dense...controlled and owned...
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Nov 22, 2018 1:25:51 GMT
It's amazing that so many things that seem 'trendy' now, for males in particular, when it comes to exploring identities, have been brewing in the back alley of forums nearly forever...
Nothing is new under the sun, just for whatever reasons some things get 'spot lighted' more than others, and or I should say people.
I've been away for a while, a long while, as was into different projects, but may start posting again, building 'thought library' again, for a few to read, ponder and possibly relate to.
Thinking about writing a e-book about 'Grace Under Fire'.
People, but particularly males, who refuse to allow others to define them in hoggish way or manner.
And particularly males of color who have to go through life feeling visually unholy.
My posts are always years ahead of their time.
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Nov 22, 2018 21:04:27 GMT
I typed in 'create perfect body type' (appealing to self)
I typed in 'create perfect body type', meaning a body type that would be appealing to self, that would either want to be or attracted to someone who had, and instead all I got was..
1. Create perfect boyfriend!!
2. Create perfect woman!!
ECT
I did not say I wanted to create perfect male or female body, I typed in I wanted to create perfect 'body' that appeals to me, which could be a blend of both!
It bugs me that in this day and age designers of such software still think along those lines.
My perfect 'mate' would have more of a androgymous type look, a blend of both male and female, tones of softness and hardness, where I wanted it.
There are certain features and traits I like about younger males, and certain features and traits I do appreciate about some females, I'd simply combine them both to create my ideal 'mate'....
It just bugs me that the designers of such software are still so lacking in vision...
No wonder someone like me will remain single for the rest of my life, cause so hard to meet that right one...and even if you do, odds are you mean less than zero to them...
|
|
